The Chief Justice admonished about thirty judges and lawyers who are involved in workers? compensation criminal cases.

The courts, according to the Chief Justice, are not there for lawyers to play games with individual or public rights. The judge warned that no more delays of judicial process will be accepted by the court. There can be no more communication specifically for publicity or other delays.

He didn’t find fault with anyone in particular. The justice called the conference after the attorney general made statements regarding several judges?

actions that may have negatively impacted the state’s ability to investigate and prosecute some workers? Kamagra compensation cases. Numerous lawyers then commented on those words; they were not pleased with the attorney general making comments outside of court.

The chief justice said the conference was designed to make sure justice was carried about speedily, and without error.

The justice continued by calling on lawyers and judges to give the worker compensation cases first priority. He also said the courts should move them up to the front of the calendar, and further expedite the trials by calling special jury terms.

One lawyer, at the conference, suggested the order was void because it lacked three of the five justices’ signatures.

The order, which also set a gag rule in order, had the signature of only one chief justice. Comments made out of court in public venues, recriminations and other criticism made specifically to sway public opinion in any manner is not helpful for the justice system.

The judge reminded the lawyers and judges that they vowed to avoid personality offenses. The justice reminded lawyers that if they had a problem with another lawyer they could address the issue in court, with the legal practice commission or the grievance committee.

The justice reminded the judges that the constitution said everyone had a right to a speedy prescription cialis generic trial, and that due process must be upheld.

Complaints and comments regarding things that had happened in the past were not allowed, but questions could be asked from the floor. Those could be dealt with by the proper people at the proper time.

One lawyer, whose client had been indicted by a grand jury, wanted to note the difference between media reporting and public comments the prosecution made.

While our constitution’s first amendment allows for freedom of reporting, the Canon of Ethics makes it clearly unethical, according to the lawyer. One lawyer claimed to have taken legal steps to protect his client, not having violated the gag rule.

When the counsel for one indicted lawyer stated that he wouldn’t be giving any of this client’s rights away, he was just trying to pick a fight. Another lawyer said that if he didn’t speak out, it may look like his client was guilty.

Another counselor said that the progression of the publicity given to workers compensation cases was increasing at an unstoppable rate. A final lawyer wanted the court to understand the horrendous effect of the negative publicity on his client, an indicted attorney.

Author Bio: As a person looking for personal injury lawyers melbourne you should visit that site. Learn more on the topic of personal injury lawyer.

Category: Legal
Keywords: Law, legal, lawyers, claim, personal injury