Climate Change Negotiations Can Not Long Delay to Decision

Cancun by the international community and the community as a human action again to curb global warming efforts. If the 2012 “Protocol” commitment period after the expiration of the first countries in the world still could not get a decent common document to restrain greenhouse gas emissions, human action to curb global warming will likely be postponed indefinitely; if the world countries to eliminate interference to reach further consensus on the adoption of new legally binding emissions reduction agreement, the living environment of human effort to save their own crisis will have a new beginning and hope.

Held in Cancun, Mexico, the United Nations climate change negotiations have been carried out for several days, so far not only no new progress, and Hengshengzhijie, Japan openly declared that “never” not on the “Kyoto Protocol” commitment period of the second to reduction commitments. Japan is clearly the stand of the “Bali road map” agreed in bad faith, to which countries have said that if Japan does not give up the subversion of the “Bali road map” position, the General Assembly in Cancun is very difficult to achieve substantive results, climate changes negotiated and legally binding, operational, can monitor the substantive agreement will likely be delayed indefinitely.

The Copenhagen meeting late last year, countries in reducing emissions and financial support on issues such as quarreling, the meeting ended without result appeared to be a foregone conclusion, finally, including China, “Basic Four” active mediation, to save the endangered rupture of the negotiations, countries signed the “Copenhagen”, so to save Copenhagen finally have a “face” of the ending. “Copenhagen” Although not legally binding, but still has some positive significance, maintenance of the “Convention” and the “Kyoto Protocol” established by “common but differentiated responsibility” principle, developed countries, mandatory emission reduction and mitigation actions taken by developing countries have made independent arrangements for long-term goals in the world, financial and technical support, transparency and other issues and reached consensus on a political resolution of a temporary, has achieved some initial results, at least continue the “Bali Roadmap” negotiations agreement. However, the Copenhagen meeting is not a complete success of the meeting, the final result with the delegates and the people falls far short of expectations, many thorny issues to be resolved this year, had left Cancun. Including the development from 2012 to 2017 global emissions reduction agreement, and developed financial and technical support to developing countries and so on, need to address the meeting in Cancun and make a decision. However, Cancun’s ability to achieve desired political outcome of all walks of life, people have different expectations. Pessimism that the “solution to the problem of climate change with long-term, we can not have too much hope on the Cancun meeting”; “Although control greenhouse gas emissions has become a political consensus, the global climate negotiations, the road is still bumpy, to the Hom Queensland Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on the completion of unfinished business, little hope. ” Positive view is that climate change is a major problem facing mankind, governance and improving the environment but also the commitment countries in the world, the most important factors and difficulties between countries need to strengthen political mutual trust. Governments have the overall situation as long as the political will to reach a substantive agreement will not end in sight.

According to the 2007’s “Bali roadmap” states the need to adopt a new agreement to replace the expiring of the “Kyoto Protocol”, the Copenhagen meeting apparently did not achieve this goal, “Copenhagen” is just to reach further to achieve this goal consensus document, not a final and legally binding agreement. For the final realization of this goal, the Cancun meeting was the international community and all walks of life as a human action to curb global warming, another effort. If the 2012 “Kyoto Protocol” commitment period after the expiration of the first countries in the world still could not get a decent common document to restrain greenhouse gas emissions, human action to curb global warming will likely be postponed indefinitely; if countries in the world to eliminate interference to reach further consensus on the adoption of new legally binding emissions reduction agreement, the living environment of human effort to save their own crisis will have a new beginning and hope.

The current ecological crisis, mainly caused by the conflict of interest. Conflict of interest is the essence of contemporary ecological crisis is a conflict of economic interests of the people reflected in the natural areas. It represents the people in the ecological environment of the current interests and long-term interests and national interests and national interests of all mankind, and the overall interests of local interests, economic interests and social interests of the conflict. But no matter what kind of interest, good and evil on this issue is only one standard of evaluation, which is to benefit society as a whole and the common interests of mankind, the world should tackle climate change as more. Therefore, regardless of the outcome of the Cancun conference final since the world has accepted the harsh reality of climate change, the face of global warming and extreme weather wreak havoc, and all governments around the world are carrying out the reflection and discussion, look for contributing to climate warming causes and Countermeasure. The original intention of the climate change negotiations, is to promote the world to act together to resist the global climate change, the home planet of mankind to avoid the tragedy of self-destruction. Interests of all countries on climate change and the consideration of complex relationships, common interests and national interests of the world were placed in what position should be, and how governments weigh the national interest and the common interests of the world, it is clear that proposition requires national governments to give the world a satisfactory The answer, of climate change negotiations can not be protracted.

Author Bio: I am a professional editor from China Products, and my work is to promote a free online trade platform. http://www.himfr.com/ contain a great deal of information about bathroom corner sink,kitchen canister sets,retractable badge holders, welcome to visit!

Category: Business
Keywords: bathroom corner sink,kitchen canister sets,retractable badge holders,

Leave a Reply