Nike, the sporting goods company, is known for its cutting edge sportswear and its ‘swoosh’ logo is one of the most recognized worldwide. However, it has been in the news for all the wrong reasons lately. The company has received a lot of flak about its manufacturing practices, more specifically, the use of sweatshops in the developing world.

The charges Cialis leveled against this international sporting goods manufacturer is that it utilizes unfair trade practices in order to manufacture its range of products that are then sold in Western nations at extremely high prices. Some part of this statement Brand Levitra certainly is true. The shoes and apparel are made in countries like the Honduras, Vietnam etc where the wages paid are a fraction of what they would be in the United States or Europe. The workers, mostly women, do not get most of the benefits that their counterparts in the developed can avail of.

This business practice of Nike, and of many other manufacturers, has been at the receiving end of so much condemnation in the media. Some people have boycotted the use of these brands, although it is safe to say that there are not too many companies that do not do the same.

Before one starts to censure these companies, one has to look at the other side of the coin in order to get a clearer picture. The fact is that these so called sweatshops are a mainstay of the economy in these developing countries. The people who work there are extremely happy to get this opportunity to generic brand for cialis earn a regular and lucrative source of income.

They view jobs such as this as an opportunity to improve their lives and to provide better opportunities and education to their children.

You must also realize that countries where these factories exist have very little legislation to protect worker’s rights. Many times these jobs are the best ones available given the educational qualifications of the workers. The truth of the matter is that they do not judge the job on the basis of the final selling price of the product or on how much a worker in the United States would earn by doing the same thing.

Of course, this does not mean that manufacturers like Nike should ride roughshod over their labor force just because they can. These companies have labor policies that tend to be better than those of the country where they are located. The probable reason that people balk at the idea of these offshore factories is the precedent set by ‘banana republics’ which used western companies to exploit their people for the gain of an elite few.
This business practice has advantages for everybody concerned.

The manufacturer is happy to get a substantial profit margin and the workers are very glad to get a regular source of income. Another set of people who are happy to benefit from this arrangement are the customers who get their sports gear at prices that suit them.

Author Bio: I am basically a graduate at the University of Hamburg and you can get awesome articles and valid information from the ones which I submit specially for you to take a look at. Check out Nike Images, Nike Graphics or Nike Pictures.

Category: Business Management
Keywords: Nike, sweatshops, worker’s rights, developing countries, manufacturing practices