Walking Shoes vs Running Shoes. What\’s the Difference?

Walking Shoes vs Jogging Shoes

At first blush it might seem walking shoes are just like jogging shoes. But that is most certainly not the case when you examine them more closely

Just how are they different?

They differ because the movement of walking and the motion of running put very different demands on your feet. That means you have to pick your footwear very carefully in each case.

Design and Styling

The more obvious differences are in the style and appearance of the shoe depending on whether it is likely to be used for walking or running.

This is because the mechanics of walking are different from the mechanics of running.

Each activity puts different demands on body motion and muscle activity so that the shoe for that activity requires features to deal with those differing demands.

Walking

Walking is a movement that distributes your body weight more uniformly through the body with a more fluid foot movement.

In walking you roll your foot from heel to toe through the ball of the foot and your bodyweight and compression are more evenly propagated over a longer period of time than in running.

There is less intensity of compression and a smoother distribution of your weight during the entire cycle.

This calls for a shoe with different heel and sole design for walking than that of a running shoe where the heel, arch and ball need to take more compression and pressure from the full weight of the running motion.

In walking, the rocking movement of the walking cycle means your feet absorb the shock of only one to two times your body weight with each step.

Also in walking, you split you weight load since both your feet are on the ground during the walking cycle.

This means your body weight is more evenly distributed and the compression on the feet is less intense as it is when running.

Running

Running is a different story altogether.

With running you\’re putting pressure equals to two to three times your body weight on one foot.

Also in running neither foot is solidly planted on the ground so the compression on feet and joints is far more intense than walking.

Your outer heel has to absorb the full compression of the landing before it distributes the body weight through your foot in an S motion through the ball to the toes.

This difference in motion and impact distribution between walking and running requires a different design and manufacture of the shoe.

Walking Shoes

Design for the walking shoe necessitates a flat heel to absorb the first contact.

The angle of the heel is lower in walking than running so compression isn\’t as high and it is distributed evenly in the roll through to the ball and in the natural motion of moving heel to toe.

This means that walking shoes need to be more flexible from the ball of the foot to give you more range of motion for the roll to the forefoot.

The heel needs to be flat without any flair compared to the running heel. This produces a better strike and compression distribution for the walker than he or she would get from a running shoe.

The heel of your running shoe is higher and has more support and padding to absorb the heavy impact of a more violent and rapid landing of the running motion.

Running shoes have less protection throughout the ball of the foot considering the rapid roll through places less pressure than the slower walking action does on the ball and toes.

Conclusion

Walking shoes as you can tell have distinct demands to meet to ensure foot support and comfort than their running counter parts.

It\’s very important to learn what those differences are when deciding on footwear for walking or running.

Author Bio: For information about walking shoes reviews walking shoes for women,walking shoes for men, general information, tips,visit WalkingShoesReviews.org

Category: Wellness, Fitness and Diet
Keywords: walking shoes,walking shoes reviews,walking shoes for women,walking shoes for men

Leave a Reply